How Thru-Hikers Protect Their Feet Over Thousands of Miles
The New York Times sent reporters to rest stops on the Pacific Crest Trail and the Colorado Trail to talk to nearly a dozen thru-hikers about how they manage their feet across thousands of miles.
Clay Masterson, Backcountry Conditioning Expert & Gear Pragmatist·updated August 30, 2026

These people grind through 20-plus miles a day, some for months straight, covering 500 to 2,600 miles in a single season. If you think your weekend long run punishes your feet, read on. This is what real volume teaches you about your own setup.
Stop Wearing Boots on Long Days
I've been saying this for years. Almost every long-distance hiker NYT spoke to chose trail runners over traditional hiking boots. Not because ankle support doesn't matter — it does on rocky, technical terrain. The issue is what it costs you over distance. Every ounce compounds. Lighter shoes mean a more efficient cadence, less torque on your knees and ankles, and more miles left in your legs at the end of the day. That's biomechanics, not opinion.
Felipe Dantas, a paramedic from Austin working through his first major thru-hike on the Colorado Trail, said the ankle support from boots starts to not matter as much as the weight once you're deep into a multi-hundred-mile trek. PCT hiker Brett Mikkelsen put it more bluntly — compared to trail runners, hiking boots feel like walking with cinder blocks on your feet. When you're logging 20-mile days, that difference isn't a preference. It's the season.
Waterproofing? Leave it on the shelf. Every hiker in the piece said the same thing — non-waterproof shoes dry faster, breathe better, and handle wet conditions better once they do get wet. A soaked waterproof membrane stays soaked. Your feet macerate. Blisters follow.
Toe Room Isn't a Luxury
Your feet swell on long efforts. Blood pools, soft tissue expands, and the shoe that fit at the trailhead becomes a vise by mile 18. I've watched trail runners limp off mountains because they trusted a shoe that was wrong from the start. The Altra Experience Wild 3+ keeps surfacing in conversations with hikers who run medium-to-wide feet because the toe box lets your toes splay. When your toes can spread, they distribute load across the forefoot instead of jamming into the front of the shoe. Less pressure per square inch. Fewer hot spots.
Daphne Smits switched from Hokas to the Altras specifically for this reason. Marie Stottmeister, another hiker in the piece, called the alternative a graveyard of blisters. She's right.
Don't End Up Cutting Holes in Your Shoes
Aubrey Ferris learned the hard way on the PCT. Her feet swelled, her shoes pinched her pinky toes, and at camp she pulled out a Swiss Army knife and cut relief holes in the side of her shoes. Two blisters, lanced with a sterilized needle right there at the site. She walked into town the next day, toes hanging out the side of her footwear, looking for help.
That's not a recommendation. That's a warning. Don't let it get that far.
If your toes hit the front of the shoe at mile 10, your shoe is wrong. If you finish every long run with hot spots, your shoe is wrong. If your feet come out looking pruney and raw, your shoe is wrong.
Test your gear under real load. Do a 15-mile day before you trust any shoe on a longer objective. Your feet will give you the verdict long before a marketing page does.